<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Potential WordPress 2.7 vulnerability?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smooshspace.com/2009/02/11/potential-wordpress-27-vulnerability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smooshspace.com/2009/02/11/potential-wordpress-27-vulnerability/</link>
	<description>Part Time Nerd::Full Time Dad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:07:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donncha O Caoimh</title>
		<link>http://smooshspace.com/2009/02/11/potential-wordpress-27-vulnerability/comment-page-1/#comment-6894</link>
		<dc:creator>Donncha O Caoimh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 19:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smooshspace.com/?p=1004#comment-6894</guid>
		<description>Take it from the horse&#039;s mouth. Photocritic got it wrong. The bug in WordPress that WP Super Cache exposed was fixed in 2.6.5. Supercache doesn&#039;t allow the exploit to continue because it&#039;s fixed.
If there is a bug and it&#039;s not just blogs that were exploited before they upgraded, it&#039;s not that rss feed bug.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take it from the horse&#8217;s mouth. Photocritic got it wrong. The bug in WordPress that WP Super Cache exposed was fixed in 2.6.5. Supercache doesn&#8217;t allow the exploit to continue because it&#8217;s fixed.<br />
If there is a bug and it&#8217;s not just blogs that were exploited before they upgraded, it&#8217;s not that rss feed bug.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
